## Conversion

# Now synthesize your FIR filters using high-school algebra

**In this second part of a two-parter, the Filter Wizard aka Kendall Castor-Perry turns the process of factorizing the polynomial representation of an FIR filter into a product of quadratic and linear factors on its head and builds up complete FIR filters from small, easy-to-understand pieces.**

**The story so far**

In Part 1 we took a regular FIR filter design and wrote down the filter coefficients in

polynomial form to get equation [1]:

Then we found all the roots of this polynomial, and used them to write down the

factorized form of the polynomial:

As a parting shot, I pointed out that there are three quadratic terms there with unity coefficients of z^0 and there are three deep nulls in the gain response of the filter, as was shown in the figures from Part 1. Lets take a deep breath and examine the responses of all these individual linear and quadratic factors, to see if there are some clues there.

Figure 1 shows the individual responses, treated as two- or three-tap FIR filters, of each of the factors in parentheses in equation [2]; the five quadratic factors marked as q1 to q5 and the four linear factors and L1 to L4. Its quite a jumble of a graph, but you dont have to be very awake to see the major salient detail: three of those quadratic factors have deep notches in the frequency response. These are indeed the three factors whose constant (z^0) coefficient is unity!

So, heres the first takeaway. In an FIR filter whose stopband contains a number of sharp nulls, each one of them comes into being because the response of one of the polynomials quadratic factors falls to zero at one frequency. Just so that we dont jump to conclusions about the particular form the factor needs to have, lets do some more algebra to make sure. Are we having fun yet?

**Please login to post your comment - click here**

- No news

- ST sees results of MEMS diversity thrust
- Startup wants to be the ARM of neuromorphic cores
- Internet blackouts by 2020, warns nanoelectronics book
- Quantum-dot image sensor launch threatens silicon
- Starting all over again on plastic: ARM
- Peter Clarke's opinion compendium updated
- Could Qualcomm be China's next target?
- Startup wants to be the ARM of analog
- Levitation by sound
- TSMC invests in EDA David that slew Google
- Will IoT make taxing the Internet inevitable?
- Book review: CHIPS 2020 updates essential view of nanoelectronics
- AMS to spend $200 million on CMOSIS buy
- On Semi set to buy Fairchild for $2.4 billion
- Sarawak-backed X-Fab invests in wafer fab

- The Advantages of Capacitive vs Optical Encoders
- High Voltage CMOS Amplifier Enables High Impedance Sensing with a Single IC
- Engineering Change Order and Implementation
- Low Power Bi-directional Level Shifter
- Haptic advancements put us in touch with complex systems
- Programmable Dual Edge Triggered Clock Divider for Staggered Clock Generation
- New Linear Regulators Solve Old Problems