Prediction and negative-delay filters: Five things you should know
January 18, 2012 | Kendall Castor-Perry | 222902919
The Filter Wizard aka Kendall Castor-Perry kicks of 2012 by posing five central questions whose answers can help designers navigate through the variety of prediction and negative delay filtering solutions.
Page 1 of 9All systems, including filters, are causal. That means they can't produce a response to an (unpredictable) stimulus before that stimulus arrives. So, how the heck can you build a filter that 'predicts' something? Well, it all depends on how high you set your sights for the quality and the relevance of that prediction.
So, riffing on the Five Things You Should Know format that was very popular last time, let's ask five central questions whose answers can help us navigate through this filtery quagmire.
How do filters delay signals?
Information can be impressed on a signal in many ways, and it always takes a finite amount of time to pass through a processing system. You'll be very familiar with the concept of the propagation delay of a digital block. It's simply the time elapsed between some state change at the input to the corresponding state change at the output of that block. The digital-minded reader's first thought might be of a stream of '1's and '0's, expressed physically as detectably different voltage or current levels. Propagation delay is fine for such signals, but not meaningful when we consider analog signals that don't really have defining features associated with particular points in time.
We often lowpass-filter signals and data sequences to get rid of 'noise' high-frequency variations that weve decided have no meaning and are getting in the way of observing a more important underlying feature. The filtering process can lend our observation a rather 'heavy touch', though; it's definitely a case of the observer affecting the observation. The most obvious consequence of conventional filtering, when we view the response graphically, is that theres clearly a time delay between variations in the input signal and corresponding variations in the filtered output. Well see this clearly on a test signal in a moment when we look at some examples.
Please login to post your comment - click here
- No news
MOST POPULAR NEWS
- Plan to re-open Rousset fab requires investors
- Micron Italian job cuts get global criticism
- Memory, firms, fabless climb chip vendor ranking
- European Commission intervenes in Micron Italian jobs case
- S3 preps DAC product with a twist
- Samsung leads chip capex ranking
- Opinion: Europe must back the Rousset Phoenix
- MEMS, magnetics set to lead sensor market rebound
- Startup launches record resolution 150Mpixel sensor
- What is an ampere?
- Teardown reveals PrimeSense in Google's Tango
- Cadence breaks into top four in semi IP core ranking
- Magnetic RAM set for 50% CAGR, says report
- Jobs saved at Micron Italy, say reports
- Ex-Omnivision engineers form image sensor startup
- Non-chopper-stabilized versus chopper-stabilized bipolar latching Hall-effect sensors
- Selecting the Best Inductor for Your DC-DC Converter
- Sensor Hardware Technology Overview
- Hall-Effect Sensor ICs for Motor Control
- Improving Voltage Regulation without Remote Sense Wires
- Mixed Signal Design and Verification for complex SoCs
- An Introduction to Rigid-Flex PCB Design Best Practices