Why are my DAC and ADC responses drooping?
May 14, 2012 | Kendall Castor-Perry | 222903402
The Filter Wizard aka Kendall Castor-Perry turns his focus on to the troublesome problem of unexpected droop when dealing your DAC and ADC responses.
Page 1 of 5Have you ever experienced unexpected droop when youve plotted out the frequency response of a signal processing system? When you expected that the frequency response would be flat (or at least accurate to the curve you designed to), but instead it rolls smoothly and lazily away from that target value, insulting you with its casual sogginess? If so, youve experienced the consequence of having a sinc() frequency response. You could say that youve had a clo-sinc-ounter though possibly of a kind other than the third. Lets look at what I mean by that.
This issue can crop up both at the input to and the output from a sampled data system. Lets look at the output first. When you want to turn a stream of sample values back into an analog system, you apply those digital samples to a DAC. Now, most DAC ICs and modules have a held output. That means that when they receive a new digital sample the output voltage changes promptly to the corresponding new value and stays there, until the next sample comes along. This behavior is so commonplace that many engineers assume that its the norm and that the output voltage of such DACs somehow represents the sample stream correctly (apart from a bit of pesky high frequency noise).
This is not true. This 'hold' process causes the frequency response of such a system to differ from that of a system where the output voltage is only asserted very briefly at each sample instant. Such a spiky output voltage is hardly ever convenient in a real world application, which is why you rarely encounter it.
Stretching each samples voltage out to 'fill the space available' is an example of a zero order hold. The output frequency spectrum of such a system is equal to that of an ideal, spiky-output system multiplied by the spectrum of the rectangular impulse that fits between two sample points, i.e. has a width equal to the sample interval. Such a rectangular time response corresponds to a frequency response that has a sinc() characteristic. sinc(x) is shorthand for sin(x)/x, and theres a Fourier looking-glass correspondence between rectangular in one domain and sinc() in another that crops up all over the place, not only in signal theory but in the whole of physics.
Please login to post your comment - click here
- No news
MOST POPULAR NEWS
- Slideshow: Top 10 sensor trends to follow
- Slideshow: Twelve shakers and movers in MEMS
- NXP staff strike for more pay
- Tech-based firm makes fun of engineers - not cool
- Google prototypes depth-sensing mobile phone
- VTT develops printable e-nose sensor
- The future of video surveillance is hyperspectral
- Integrated analog: what's missing?
- Microsoft preps next time-of-flight sensor for Kinect
- Opinion: the hyperspectral era has already begun
- Piezo-nanowires boost fingerprint resolution
- Top ten CMOS image sensor vendors ranked
- Qualcomm leads, Intel lags in smartphone processor market
- Covidien to swallow pill camera firm
- Depth-sensing image sensor array touted for smartphones
- Hall-Effect Sensor ICs for Motor Control
- Improving Voltage Regulation without Remote Sense Wires
- Mixed Signal Design and Verification for complex SoCs
- An Introduction to Rigid-Flex PCB Design Best Practices
- 4-20 mA, Loop Powered, Thermocouple System Using ARM
- EMC Compliant RS-485 Transceiver Protection Circuits
- Isolated 4-Channel, Thermocouple/RTD Temperature Measurement System with 0.5Â°C Accuracy